"It is clear that some of the 'world's leading climate scientists,' as they are always described, are more dedicated to promoting the alarmist political agenda than in scientific research," The Washington Post
Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal.
Fortunately, the more alarmists who admit the seriousness of this scandal, the more likely global warming-obsessed media will have to more aggressively investigate the truth of the matter.
Dr. John P. Holdren, is a key player in the Climategate e-mails flap, which is shaping up as the biggest scandal in the history of modern science.
Mainstream media is whitewashing this story — so it is up to us to get this info out!
Hurricane Expert Rips Climate Fears: 'There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination' Click Here
Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for Global Warming fraud / John Coleman
In light of the recent exposure of the emails by the UN agency scientists to hide data that did not support global warming, it is no surprise that there has been a deliberate agenda by the media to keep this group of 30,000 scientists from being heard.
store.afa.net Not Evil Just Wrong is the film Al Gore and Hollywood don't want you to see. It reveals the true human cost of Global Warming hysteria.
This 2007 documentary blows the whistle on what may be the biggest swindle in modern history. Proponents of man-made global warming (led by Al Gore) warn that climate change is the greatest threat ever to mankind, and if we do not change our ways and reduce CO2 emissions, polar ice caps will melt, coastal areas will flood and hurricanes like Katrina will become common.
With nearly Gestapo like tactics, we are commanded not to question the edicts of the IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. There is absolutely no room for doubt because there is a "scientific consensus." Anyone who questions the data or conclusion is an enemy of the state and humanity.
This film interviews some of the world's leading scientists, climatologists and former environmentalists, who challenge and contradict these claims.
The above graph is just one of many compelling figures Paul Drallos, Ph.D. presents in his article dismissing the theory of man's intervention as to Global warming. A must read article. His analysis is quite impressive.
Thank you for contacting me regarding the activities of the Climate Research Unit. I am glad to have the benefit of your views on this issue.
I understand and share your concerns about this situation. The Climate Research Unit (CRU) in England is one of the United Nations' foremost institutes for climate change research. In mid-November, an anonymous source published over a thousand e-mails from CRU personnel on the internet. The content of the emails suggest that many CRU personnel were acting in a very unscientific fashion to manipulate data, marginalize dissenting scientists, and avoid British Freedom of Information Act requests.
In December 2009, countries participated in a climate change conference in Copenhagen with the goal of developing a new international climate agreement. The agreement would follow the Kyoto Protocol, which was negotiated in 1997 and is set to expire in 2012. While the Clinton Administration signed the Kyoto Protocol, the U.S. Senate declined to ratify it.
The Copenhagen conference ended without an agreement and requirements to continue negotiating in advance of the next conference in Mexico City in December 2010. The "Copenhagen Accord" was not adopted, but countries "took note of" the accord, reflecting compromises on some key actions. These conversations will continue throughout the year. Article II of the Constitution requires that the U.S. Senate ratify any treaty the President signs with a two-thirds vote. As a U.S. Senator and as a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, I have a responsibility to review proposed treaties to ensure that they preserve and advance our national interest.
Currently, Congress is considering two bills designed to reduce carbon emissions. The House of Representatives narrowly passed the America Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) on June 26, 2009, by a vote of 219 to 212. The Senate has yet to consider this legislation. However, Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and John Kerry (D-MA) introduced the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act (S. 1733) in the Senate on September 30, 2009. Both of these bills require substantial reductions on carbon emissions, with the American consumer ultimately bearing the costs. I am opposed to any sort of legislation to enact cap and trade because it would have no effect on climate change and is an unwarranted tax increase on the American people.
Be assured I will keep your views in mind as Congress continues to consider energy related legislation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can ever be of assistance.